Development Priorities Poll

[Raj]

Hello gamers,

I can't speak for the other devs, but I personally have no preference on what I work on next. However I'm sure it helps us all to know what people want to see. And so why not just poll it and see how everyone feels.

So here are the options. I just want to see comparitively what people want the most. You can choose 3 options.

1. Tombs of Amascut
2. Nex revamp
3. Combat Achievements
4. ToB Hard Mode
5. Group ironman
6. Instances rework (paid instances)
7. PvP Revamp (viewtopic.php?f=134&t=85457)

Now things to keep in mind:
1. There are 3 of us actively doing development right now, and these things will probably happen in parallel, assuming the other devs decide they don't mind working on the selections.
2. There's currently 107 combat achievements implemented. I'd like to get it over 150 before releasing them, but that probably represents a much smaller time investment than the others.
3. There's other stuff being worked on currently and whatever is chosen here would be entering the queue.

Please vote, thanks...

[Empty]

Long awaited instances plssss

[Akuizm]

TOA first please. Then gim and pvp.

[Jayden]

As a long term Pvmer, PVP first please.
it's the one thing that we constantly lack on in terms of anything else and it could arguably be the best for our server getting a different set of players back to the game.

Spoiler: show

Need to merch new kids ty

[Fungamer]

As a long term Pvmer, PVP first please.
it's the one thing that we constantly lack on in terms of anything else and it could arguably be the best for our server getting a different set of players back to the game.

Spoiler: show

Need to merch new kids ty

[Iron adam]

Combat achievements and PvP revamp. I would love to see some changes to PvP that de-incentivice pkers killing skillers/ironmen/pvmers who risk nothing. Maybe LMS has a place in this? idk

[Church]

Combat achievements and PvP revamp. I would love to see some changes to PvP that de-incentivice pkers killing skillers/ironmen/pvmers who risk nothing. Maybe LMS has a place in this? idk

If you deincentivize that too much does it still make sense to have all the benefits of the wild?
Obviously I'm not saying add LMS then make the wild the same as anywhere else, that would be stupid, but would you think we'd need to reexamine them?

[Fungamer]

Combat achievements and PvP revamp. I would love to see some changes to PvP that de-incentivice pkers killing skillers/ironmen/pvmers who risk nothing. Maybe LMS has a place in this? idk

If you deincentivize that too much does it still make sense to have all the benefits of the wild?
Obviously I'm not saying add LMS then make the wild the same as anywhere else, that would be stupid, but would you think we'd need to reexamine them?

I think there'll always be people who just want to pk pvmers instead of engaging in actual pvp. Yes we consider them shitters but the risk of entering wildy will still be the same for pvmers (if not more due to pvp overhauls potentially pulling in new ppl)

[The underdog]

#capestopresets2k18

I mean #pvprevamp

[James]

accept the reality of the server and just stick to pvm updates, you're better off catering to the people that actually play the game rather than hoping to draw in pkers that dont exist